Pasht the cat sailing by the Sun under his foot crushing the head of the serpent of darkness. Mau is the seer in the dark.
The moon is the eye of the sun because it reflected the sunlight and because his eye reflecting in its mirror image in the form of the goddess Pasht.
Anatomy is destiny
Sigmund Freud
Del kidnapping and abduction
Seduction is the very strategy 'Diaulos'. Is the 'Tata grip' who seeks from the dark, using devices (lohkos) and col'e pork, dominate the world. Thus, "the seduction represents mastery of the symbolic universe, while the power is only the domain of the real universe." [2] And as seduction, as noted Piccoptero: "hidden and implies a need production process by involving speeches, words and desires (...)" [3] .
will have to make poetry, "about art (= art) of making poetry, which usually gives the name of Poetics and the drafting of which was approximately between 334 and 330 a. C. Plato poetry has been characterized as "sacred fury" (Theia mania), enthusiasm and Raptus, ie, as something irrational and therefore immoral, thus leaving a negative theory of it. Plotinus with his mystical conception of beauty as the essence 'no way', as a pure reflection of Aristotle (...) One developed a concept of poetry as 'mimesis' (imitation) or 'Plausibility'. " [4]
Consequently, reading is a mental activity that allows the subject language to access the content of the text by proxy, this means that this actually can access a totality of meaning by identifying and disidentification (clarification / concealment) of the forms in other ways.
So to access a text occurs form perception (of speech, gender, and text) that allow mental activation of meaning (substance / form) which is the result of a representation of what said and not said.
The reader not only receives but does work and recreational activity on the text. Each statement has a way of focusing on the text. And this is because within the mechanics of reading readers do not read the same way. By far the reader reads what to read and keep a memory close, near and far highly selective in which memorizes morfosintácticvas structures, forms and representations, ie polarizes the text given their own cognitive and affective structures focusing on what is memorized. Then we address, the following:
She sleeps in the depths of a mountain. Waiting for your Prince comes to rescue. The paradox arises if we think that when she wakes up, he will cease to exist.
In a second reading of the brief, reproduction or reformulation will find the hidden content of the text according to language skills of the subject. Always remembering that the language is not monoreferencial, given existence of mindset as a result of our cognitive structure, in this notion is as much loss as gain, since by its definition and its applicability would allow them to account for these frames.
If from a pragmatic point of view they tried to introduce the user in the text. From a deconstructionist perspective, try to safeguard the user of the text. But, it also provides an alternative dispute resolution, aims to disrupt the system because of conceptual oppositions from a metaphysics of truth sought to justify the presence of meaning to an awareness or force majeure. Deconstruction breaks into a thought of writing a script writing.
In this context, our goal is to bring the thought of Jacques Derrida in his series, since, in dialogue with authors such as Bataille, Foucault, Althusser, Blanchot, Deleuze, Guattari, Lyotard, and Klossowski, wants to take a context determined that it will uncover that the subordination of writing the word is, but a prejudice. Associated
dissolution of borders, multiple interpretations, and Grammatology. His numerous neologisms always reinforce the duplicity of language: arche, trace, difference, spacing, and parergon. Redefines concepts like: Origin, delay, and text. Questioned the notions of: Author, book, font, origin, system, method, development, evolution, influences, and interpretation. Problematizes about the identity of being and consciousness. E opens a thought of non-presence.
That tropic status of philosophy
Deconstructing Jacques Derrida was assumed that a 'gesture' of structuralism [5] that bore the "structural problems" from a perspective antiestructuralista. Since, it was undone, decomposed, de-settle all structures of one form or another trench acted as immovable, and to justify in the background or belief, later historical events.
The so-called "structural problem" implies that on the basis of knowing and allow us to adapt to technical criteria, whose practice human relations made possible through processes of intersubjective understanding.
Men and women are able to fix objects, name them and sort them into a conceptual order. The canon of science seems to be able to explain and interpret all possible conditions as a confirmation of their own theories [6] .
If at any minute the language allowed to justify the unjustifiable, it is because language creates reality. Now. If we focus our attention on the notion of representation, picking up the philosophical tradition of Plato and Aristotle based on communication, representation, and symbolization principles of discourse. We note that henceforth, the behavior would be associated with certain types of speech, since the language does not designate a pre-existing reality to it. In this sense, languages \u200b\u200bare not a mechanism of representation of reality but that the organization [7] . Every language
fixed
argumentative structure provides a guideline for the screening of various speeches by reaching social structure affect the system of attitudes, behaviors then, a psychological depth that necessarily involves our values. The speeches are always saved values \u200b\u200bties of familiarity with their culture.
recognize the contribution of European structuralism both helped to shape Western thought with its cutting componential approach to investigate morphosyntactic patterns, although in this model, the text is more than the sum of words. Foucault says "structuralism is not a new method, but awake and uneasy conscience of modern knowledge" [8] .
Thus, the framework of semiotics and semiology declarative cognitive French European language is treated as objects. In this analysis, the text is studied from its structure and language. In the 70's and 80, in addition to the declarative models are textual Nordic models who were concerned by the development of text based on three dimensions: coherence, cohesion and connection. And the pragmatic-integrated Nordic models interested in the relationship between text and social aspects.
sociolinguistic models and declarative (Bembeniste) are interested in letting the indices or subjective marks the objects of communication. The aim is to analyze the subjective language of the message marks. The language is an act of enunciation where the subject is stated, is a linguistic part of the subject and related items cognitive, since they are interested in the inferential processes of meaning construction.
The event is a text, so it is a complete linguistic unit. Every text has a number of sequences and macropropositions. And because they do not work with the notions of sentence (grammatical approach too), or paragraph (graphics unit of meaning), but set as a unit of meaning is complete. Thus, the text belongs to a genre [9] , and this in turn belongs to a speech that clearly is dominated by a context that makes its terms. Then the verbal context (gender) Make your legibility conditions.
In this context, deconstruction arises tropological reveal the condition of the philosophy of language. Based on the figures, metaphors, metonymy, but also translations, transfers, wandering and shipping. Including leaving the purely ornamental eloquence and vivacity of this, we are interested in the philosophical text game on the field of representation.
To identify the Telos to which we refer the text, we must inquire, first: What is the dimension of context? And secondly, we must distinguish the literal sense and metaphorically. The affirmation of the primariness the first, its meaning, and the differentiability the second, language filtering, that which says otherwise unsaid.
Deconstruction [10] as Derrida
Structuralism was the name given to a scientific method, that did not include its effect in philosophical discourse. Deconstruct involves the fact disrupt the construction of a sentence, or disassemble into parts in a search machine aporias iconoclastic, dark spots and moments of self-contradiction. Deconstruction explores around the limits of the principle of reason in the West.
Currently, the deconstructions have taken the place of the descriptions, since, even though this is not a method, it provides a reading strategy seeks a sliding mechanism or text that exceeds the intensional meaning of the sender, ie what the text says in its obligation to mean, not necessarily, what the author originally intended.
phenomenology was proposed to describe phenomena and to distinguish one phenomenon from others. But, recognizing the 'phenomenon' is' appears consciousness', took place 'between parenthesis "the actual existence of the phenomenal thing, and, consequently, to identify the self and consciousness.
However, the phenomenological reduction is a prejudice, which means you can not go beyond experience, and experience, therefore, always lived by someone. And so, what direction is taken, is the sense that has the "experience" of someone (Erlebnis). For example, sleep, joke, language errors, but besides delusions, altered states of consciousness and perception disorders are expressions of an experience that ultimately it is always particular. Therefore, the objects of study, and bounded by structuralism, they resent being treated the statement is analyzed as an expression of an experience. Because the statements are configured according to the restrictions of the philosophical discourse.
"The sender does not comply both inside as to what dictates their own language. Then, the illusion of philosophical discourse unveil deconstruction, would say the transition from objective to subjective genitive genitive. (...) The ambition of a deconstruction in philosophy would be to demonstrate how they are constructed philosophical discourse. The goal of deconstruction is to propose a theory philosophical discourse. " "Hegel had said that the difference is self-contradictory. But now it is paving the way for thinking the difference is not contradictory, not dialectical, it would not be the mere opposite of the identity and would not be subject to the constraint of having to recognize dialectically identical to the identity.
Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida, finally addressing the crux of the matter ... In the language of logic (ie ontology), the problem is the dialectic. In the language of philosophy of history (ie, theology, metaphysics) ... is unity between man and nature: the meaning of this unit is precisely the sense of identity as the dialectic in which the determination. " [11]
We had recognized that "the order of reason is absolute, because we can not appeal against her but she can not protest against it but it keeps us in its own ground, but the use of ruse and strategy ...".
is therefore impossible to speak against reason, but through it. And this is precisely the starting point of Derrida: talk to say nothing.
There is only one possibility, the trick: the ruse and strategy; pretend to obey the rule tyrannical but also puts traps in situations that can not solve.
The strategy of deconstruction is "the trick that allows you to speak at the same time that, on balance, there is nothing to say, for all the speech was made, therefore, in this order of the utterance simulation simulation simulation is (to make as if I really ... I only pretended to pretend ... after the comedian was hiding a murderer " [12] .
strategist not think so could and say the wrong thing ... namely, that truth is not really true ... and that the law does not differ from the arbitrary.
"The difference does not stand up to ownership, does not impose an outer limit (...) Death is the difference motion of the difference in necessarily finite. Ie the difference that allows the opposition to the presence and absence (...) The difference produces what it forbids, makes possible the very thing that makes it impossible " [13] .
The metaphysics of presence [14]
How can we become motionless as essences? How to move from subjective loneliness intersubjective community?, and how can a truth for us?, but for all beings. Does that make a difference in identity, respect at all, the future in eternity?
philosophy is always, Derrida says phenomenologically. This is an eidetic necessity: the philosophy is always thinking of presence.
But is it possible to think outside the primacy of this?, Can you deny this?, Does this attribute on the absent?, Is it possible a thought beyond the absolute reason?, "La différance identity is reduced to a Hegelian dialectic? always mean necessarily bring the unconditioned to the conditioned?.
Moreover, how far the difference becomes inequality? Forgive the indefensible, to justify the unforgivable, and staining of historicity to everything including time.
philosophy begins with the opposition between fact and law. At least it is for those initiated by Husserl in philosophy, with its eidetic reduction. A fact can prove nothing about the essence, as to what is right. What mistake must not yield to the univocal. Gadamer add "that Husserl was more of a mathematician who transferred the sense of being the ideal, the subject of mathematics, his theory of meaning. " [15]
The empiricist does not believe in the distinction between truths of fact and truths of reason ... the alleged truths of reason to after all are true in fact, as the ultimate reason for a truth of reason is always a primitive fact. Therefore maintains that there is no pure reason: fundamental truths of reason is not in a capacity that would have a priori reason to know things, but in the relationship of reason to this fact early and last, ie experience having it. In other words, The fundamental principle is not an identity of type I = I, is a difference because it is the relationship with something else.
Descombes points out that empiricism is the dream of a purely heterological thought originally. Pure thought of pure difference (...). Say dream because it fades with the day and since the dawn of language. And Derrida is about to commit a sin knowingly empiricism. But this must be beyond reproach ... intended to be a double play bad in their intentions but their moves impeccable [16] .
know beforehand that the facts and the law never coincide with the law. Nevertheless, phenomenology search history ... the source of truth ... while it is static, has its roots in an act of conscience can make all the time: he calls home (to the truth of judgments about the thing) to the intuition of the thing present in meat and bone (...) If the source is the intuition, I can always return to this home ... the event of which I speak all these reproductions. The characteristic of historical phenomenology is that the 'thing itself' is the first fact, which by definition occurs only once. This event takes place at least a first time. This event takes place at least one first time, this 'first time' of which we speak documents [17] .
Being no longer be identified with the sense, as would a being that would not exist for us, ... unacceptable for a phenomenological possibility. The phenomenology of the story is based on the description of what Husserl called the living present: the past can not be separated from this (...).
If the past were not retained in the present, if the future is not already outlined in it, nothing would be past and future. That is, would be absolutely absent ... These ruins of a vanished civilization forever.
But for the future, 'announced' in the present and the past 'hold' on it, also need to be both present and past and present and yet to come through this past is still present and the future and present. The past as such will be for us a present that is no longer present and the future will have been always and forever a present that was not yet present. It is then when you see the difference: difference and non-coincidence of this with itself [18] .
Finally, "Seduction is that which has no representation possible, because the distance between reality and its double, the distortion between the Self and the Other is abolished." [19]
The differance [20]
What is meant by differance is the mechanism that sets off to deconstruction disclose or uncover what is both manifest and latent in the text. The differance that meaning is a product of differences, differences that in turn is 'displaced' in time. The meanings are produced in the absence of the abovementioned objects, only the interpretation happen from there. As if there was a 'memory' or 'reservoir' [21] language that allows the non-existent, simply exists. 'From there' the production process makes sense in terms of a sign is a sign of something else, finally, absent.
With his acute thinking, Derrida does not end "inaugurating a conceptualization that would no longer that of a metaphysics of presence or absence (...) would then need to define a space within which this 'contradiction' is regulated been possible and can be described. " [22] There is, therefore, in or out but only a reflection surface. The outside is inside, yet unnamed, always has been ...
Then, the reference is only a matter of intertextuality, deconstruction because it is based, ultimately, to the absence of transcendent meaning. Since then, the story should be seen as 'history of meaning' tradition or trans-lation of meaning over time. Denotes such as Descombes.
model history seems to be the tradition embodied in such set theorem, the Newton law of motion, and the theories of Darwin and Maxwell-Boltzmann. Note especially in the "Discourse on Method" Descartes writes from the French "Language which was just extended in philosophical discourse ... becomes ... in a speech on his own language becomes a treaty of speech. " [23]
Notice that Descartes writes in the vernacular appeal to natural reason, and therefore explicitly targeted at a large public [24] , which eventually reach his own conclusions. The key point here is that if true is identical to the real thing for me, I become the god par excellance Descartes, creator of the eternal truths. Thus, for identification between being and the meaning does not involve degradation apparently simple phenomenon, it is necessary that God necessarily is present.
If the facts and the law does not coincide with the law. Submit the unconditioned to the conditioned is a vain attempt, because the ambiguity will not give (fall) to the univocal. There is a difference
original
a difference, this delay time tells the story originating (...). If there is no differance from the origin (whenever there origin), 'the first time', the first time would not be 'the first time', it would not be followed by a second time, and if the first was the 'one time', would not be the origin nothing at all. If there is no second, how to identify first with the source / origin? The former requires the latter to have existence. And thus the native second presents some priority, as a condition present since the first time. Then, the first time in fact represented the third time.
"The differance (...) that divides the different meaning and fullness without end, without purpose and divides without teleological horizon allowed to resume consciousness dialectically" [25] .
conceive the origin trial [26] a premiere, playing the first public performance. Consequently, the No-Origin, or original call. Principle of Non-principle by which deconstructs the principle of principles.
So there is no identity?. In the beginning
repetition. In the beginning the performance. In fact, no representation, because the presentation never took place. Since the original and a copy.
Given this scenario, deconstruction aims to hatch, fracturing, or disrupt the system of conceptual oppositions from a metaphysical [27] of truth seeks to justify the presence the meaning of a conscience or God, call it at that, Spirit.
the actant and Black Star
Between seduction and death instinct ... comes the text. Who saturated versatility and potential, overflows dissemination: diffraction, inflection, intensity, thickness, branching, and machinations delezianas. Endless dance of reflexes and memory trends together by an illusion that immerses us in a fantasy imaginative and perceptive.
"Seduction is what eludes the sense discourse and away from the truth. It would be the opposite the psychoanalytic distinction between speech and discourse manifest latent [28] . " To distinguish the original and derivative, legitimize the impostor. In other words: In the beginning was the sign. The sign and not the thing ... of which is significant.
actant The impostor is the black star, theme and necessary, both to the same God looks over his work to fall in love himself, as related in the Zohar, the light turns into darkness ...
For this reason, the priority of the sign requires an examination of writing. E ingadar if tradition subornina necessarily writing the word.
The surrounding world, sometimes taken as real, is an objectification as perspectivísticas rules, or, in the sense of Berger and Luckman, a social construction of reality. Moreover, consciousness is never before language. Therefore, it can not be regarded as an expression (representation) of an experience. If the impostor
seduce, you do not have that which gives life. Its logic forced him to consume extra over the account. Because that which strengthens it also makes it more dependent on this wise milk whose husband is tyrannical order. The laxative is right. If writing was a bad gut would say that was with diarrhea.
Only the consciousness of artifice has the power to alter the depth Renaissance, the line of flight is not seeking depth, but opens to a front door to go next door. Extension of reality when the hierarchical organization seen in function of the eye.
simulation disenchanted, like porn, is he wants to do the same vicissitudes without the desired result. As it was, there is always another chance for the final act. So, I conclude: The writing serves as a supplement.
I return to the original story. In recalling their content is different: This sweet princess look soles waiting to ignite your soul. Stardust I say hands, to figure that if I wash them, their beauty is gone. "To seduce is to die as reality and illusion occur as" [29] . Deconstruct is to seduce.
Out of the whole, the supplement
No out of context [30] . Either everything is text, or no text. At the origin there is the original, but a supplement that acts as a continuously vanishing something original. The logic allows integration of an extra charge the whole. But if the supplement was not at all from the beginning, nothing would. Perhaps it always was, from the very beginning. There is no lack absolute vacuum is not contain.
natural world only becomes significant when the subject of a diacrisis, a cut that ensures the triumph of the limit (pears), on the chaos without boundaries (apeiron). This limit provides a warm place to shelter the deformation of the concept of Being from a metaphysics that knows no objections but prescriptions.
Against this background and since in a position to dispose of it, stands as the supplement. The charge from the outside serves as the part of the whole absent inside, as everything does not become the whole, to meet all evanescent, it is necessary to add an extra out. "A more than replacing a less that what is added to something takes the place of the lack of that thing" [31] . This is filed under that absent: The mark of the absent.
footprint this is the sign of something absent, whose latent function is ultimately define. "Relationship with a past that escapes memory at the origin of meaning, which disrupts the economy of presence and enter into the life of incalculable signs it, the outside." [32]
The definition of the sign in reality is the definition of any sign (any sign is a signifier whose meaning is another significant and never the thing itself present to us, as we appear to our senses.
In the words of Derrida, "Writing is the ultimate supplement, since it indicates the place where the supplement is given as a supplement of supplement, sign sign, acting as a short and significant" [33 ] .
Beyond [34] of dialectics [35]
If that came as a lamb, will return as a lion, it is because we became aware of himself through his way of being there, he knows which is a projection of I [36] , which when fixed, separate and apart. But, how to be able to experience is essential and be able to manifest in everyday life in a real course? Or else, how to be able to distinguish the body that has the body that is?
"All the senses can be summarized in a quality and the different meanings can be recognized in a particular quality, is it possible to develop the body of the differentiation of attributes?. And yet, is it possible to think outside the primacy of this?, Can we reject this?
In his Enneads, Plotinus states that the Intelligence [37] wants to be the One, he looks at him and sees him finding no separate ... Want to be the One, but not the One . is necessary, then, a thought of non-presence, not only the opposite of 'philosophy', but there is thinking outside the present, and thus an experience thought. Experience testifies that does not exclude presence absence.
experience is again at risk of becoming general in a more empirical. Derrida does not refer to a particular experience that overrides a general proposition, it is not possible to refute the principle of identity. But denounces the false identity of what is presented, ie, reveals how the identity concealed a difference.
now. Not only is the differance hide identity but concealed and allows, by such metaphysical appeal to a higher principle or identity that finally justifies all historicity. That identity 'high' would be in another place, other than the sedentary space that the tradition had been assigned by location.
That experience usually requires the expertise of general text. All text is twofold. Two texts in one. The first retains the classic sense and presence. The second is not accessible to them first, yet it is decipherable, then, marks or tears must first referring to the second. As it was, the two are not opposites, not reconcilable, if not similar, or slightly out of date.
The thought of not presence [38] is not a foreign thought [39] , at a historic moment exotic. Is itself while another drill itself. The value of truth of a statement is not guaranteed by the bond between it and the person issuing it, but rather are spaced, the sender and the message by the very nature of language.
Thus, between the text of Plato and he crosses a faint veil that separates him from himself. That gap oblique reflecting surface provides that the thinking required to establish their double science. This text allows the transgression and excess latent shows for the text.
There is no difference in the meaning of 'opposite', in / out, desire / satisfaction. Identity is difference and differance is identity. Finally, the double meaning can not be controlled, but to deconstruct.
No out of context [30] . Either everything is text, or no text. At the origin there is the original, but a supplement that acts as a continuously vanishing something original. The logic allows integration of an extra charge the whole. But if the supplement was not at all from the beginning, nothing would. Perhaps it always was, from the very beginning. There is no lack absolute vacuum is not contain.
natural world only becomes significant when the subject of a diacrisis, a cut that ensures the triumph of the limit (pears), on the chaos without boundaries (apeiron). This limit provides a warm place to shelter the deformation of the concept of Being from a metaphysics that knows no objections but prescriptions.
Against this background and since in a position to dispose of it, stands as the supplement. The charge from the outside serves as the part of the whole absent inside, as everything does not become the whole, to meet all evanescent, it is necessary to add an extra out. "A more than replacing a less that what is added to something takes the place of the lack of that thing" [31] . This is filed under that absent: The mark of the absent.
footprint this is the sign of something absent, whose latent function is ultimately define. "Relationship with a past that escapes memory at the origin of meaning, which disrupts the economy of presence and enter into the life of incalculable signs it, the outside." [32]
The definition of the sign in reality is the definition of any sign (any sign is a signifier whose meaning is another significant and never the thing itself present to us, as we appear to our senses.
In the words of Derrida, "Writing is the ultimate supplement, since it indicates the place where the supplement is given as a supplement of supplement, sign sign, acting as a short and significant" [33 ] .
Beyond [34] of dialectics [35]
If that came as a lamb, will return as a lion, it is because we became aware of himself through his way of being there, he knows which is a projection of I [36] , which when fixed, separate and apart. But, how to be able to experience is essential and be able to manifest in everyday life in a real course? Or else, how to be able to distinguish the body that has the body that is?
"All the senses can be summarized in a quality and the different meanings can be recognized in a particular quality, is it possible to develop the body of the differentiation of attributes?. And yet, is it possible to think outside the primacy of this?, Can we reject this?
In his Enneads, Plotinus states that the Intelligence [37] wants to be the One, he looks at him and sees him finding no separate ... Want to be the One, but not the One . is necessary, then, a thought of non-presence, not only the opposite of 'philosophy', but there is thinking outside the present, and thus an experience thought. Experience testifies that does not exclude presence absence.
experience is again at risk of becoming general in a more empirical. Derrida does not refer to a particular experience that overrides a general proposition, it is not possible to refute the principle of identity. But denounces the false identity of what is presented, ie, reveals how the identity concealed a difference.
now. Not only is the differance hide identity but concealed and allows, by such metaphysical appeal to a higher principle or identity that finally justifies all historicity. That identity 'high' would be in another place, other than the sedentary space that the tradition had been assigned by location.
That experience usually requires the expertise of general text. All text is twofold. Two texts in one. The first retains the classic sense and presence. The second is not accessible to them first, yet it is decipherable, then, marks or tears must first referring to the second. As it was, the two are not opposites, not reconcilable, if not similar, or slightly out of date.
The thought of not presence [38] is not a foreign thought [39] , at a historic moment exotic. Is itself while another drill itself. The value of truth of a statement is not guaranteed by the bond between it and the person issuing it, but rather are spaced, the sender and the message by the very nature of language.
Thus, between the text of Plato and he crosses a faint veil that separates him from himself. That gap oblique reflecting surface provides that the thinking required to establish their double science. This text allows the transgression and excess latent shows for the text.
There is no difference in the meaning of 'opposite', in / out, desire / satisfaction. Identity is difference and differance is identity. Finally, the double meaning can not be controlled, but to deconstruct.
+ + + +++++
+++++++++
[1] Rossel Sebastian Salas, Professor University of La Serena, 2005.
[2] Baudrillard, J., "De la seduction", Ed Chair, Madrid, p.15.
[3] Piccoptero, A., "We the commanded Horacio", Ed Forzum, Bogotá, 1974, p. 45.
[4] Della Volpe, G., "History of Taste", Ed Visor, The Raft of the Medusa, Madrid, 1987, p. 19.
[5] " is Structuralism ... the name that has been known to say, the conversion of the critical philosophy of phenomenology . (...) The inventor of the structural method is probably "The teacher of philosophy" Moliere staged in "The Bourgeois Gentleman" (Act II, Scene V). Mr. Jourdin want to write a letter to the Marquise ... He asks a rhetorical lesson the teacher ... "I only said these words of the paper, but willing according to fashion, arranged properly. Please tell me more or less, to get an idea, the various ways you can make. (...) There are two stages solving this problem: 1. identify the elements, and proceed to do the breakdown of the given set ... in elemental segments. 2. discover the different ways of composing these elements, so we get different messages and each other. " Descombes, V., "So and so", Ed Chair, Colección Teorema, Madrid, 1998, pp. 112-114.
[6] In positivist science concepts are meaningful only verifiable. Since the Vienna Circle and logical positivism positivist tradition collect objective thinking and the ability of science to discover the truth and the use of mathematical logic and to set standards and requirements of inquiry.
[7] Everything is in the language is in our world, it provides a linguistic register before which we can establish certain controls. Now, do not refer discourses circulating Cartesian truth, but with arguments supported cultural truths in terms of plausibility
[8] Foucault, M., "The Order of Things", Ed,, p. 206.
[9] are traditional categories of texts, such as: descriptive, argumentative, dialogue and narrative. And then there are texts: groundless, of opposition, and prescriptive.
[10] Secondly Call Spread (writing as thinking, track the difference). However, in its original context comes from the Destruktion * and ** Abbau spoken of Heidegger in Being and Time about the history of ontotheology. Both concepts allow an application to the structure or the traditional structure of the concepts of ontology "white."
* The Destruktion could appoint a negative operation here that the description highlights a simple data reception. Deconstruction is the form that highlights the phenomenological naivety, and therefore, this word is understood in a negative direction (down), but very positive (narrow) ...
** De-sedimentation of the layers of meaning in the genetic history of intentional production.
[11] Descombes, V., "So and so", Ed Chair, Colección Teorema, Madrid, 1998, pp. 110-179.
[12] Descombes, V., Ibid. pp. 183-184.
[13] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 183.
[14] Ontology present in Vattimo's words, aesthetics of existence in Foucault.
[15] Gadamer, H., "The hermeneutic turn", Ed Chair, Madrid, p. 97.
[16] For this reason, one might inquire sila phenomenology should pass through or radicalize "?.
[17] philological In the sense?
[18] significance of the difference may divide the present, and makes no absences. But it also makes this place really never have.
[19] Baudrillard, J., "De la seduction", Ed Chair, Madrid, p.67.
[20] Neologism created by Derrida from the verb differ: Differen, retarder, or carriers, verbs that one way or another further accentuate the notion of original delay. Differ is 'not identical' This differs from itself. It also means' leave for more forward ', this is a present deferred. This difference is what produces the story. If history is because from the beginning this is to lag itself.
[21] In the sense of 'catalog', 'file', or 'album', which in any way is a function of their shirts, sheets or windows that always lead somewhere.
[22] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 309.
[23] Derrida, J., "The philosophical language and institutions ", Ed, 1995, p. 32.
[24] "... the school and the books have not obscured or overshadowed ...", Derrida, J., Ibid, p. 62.
[25] Peñalver, P., in the introduction to the work of Derrida, J., "The deconstruction at the borders of philosophy-The withdrawal of metaphor", Polity Press / ICE - UAB Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1989, p.17.
[26] Repetition of the word repeat, repeat, reproduce, reflect. Test.
[27] "Metaphysics is then to exclude non-presence determining the supplement as simple exteriority, as mere addition, or as pure absence." Derrida, J., Ibid, p.211.
[28] Baudrillard, J., Ibid, p. 55.
[29] Baudrillard, J., Ibid, p. 69.
[30] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 203.
[31] Derrida, J., "Of Grammatology" p. 308.
[32] Peñalver, P., Ibid, p.17.
[33] Derrida, J., Ibid, p. 398.
[34] Is there a place outside of metaphysics that allows us to withstand the pressure of Logos? Or are we doomed to provide all that is in a structural sense, and give, sickly at all-as-you-we-show, meaning.
[35] Left unfinished investigate the relationship of Derrida in Hegel ...
[36] The form gives the impression of separation.
[37] Intelligere in Latin means "to read in depth the meaning of things", he read deeply to be understood as a system of signs or language back to humanity.
[38] Benjamin and Bataille are precedents to this thought, since both were questioned, the first in what is absent and the second in exaltation about 'what remains' in the text.
[39] Following the so-called "foreign thoughts" (returns to myth, foreign traditions, and Eastern wisdom) Foucault developed a constitutive element of being, which he calls 'souci de toi' under a 'techne tou biou', ie existential practice allows the subject to overcome himself, or self-improvement: Self-healing, understood ascetic techniques, yoga and demases ... These are all technologies I = (Home Care).
[2] Baudrillard, J., "De la seduction", Ed Chair, Madrid, p.15.
[3] Piccoptero, A., "We the commanded Horacio", Ed Forzum, Bogotá, 1974, p. 45.
[4] Della Volpe, G., "History of Taste", Ed Visor, The Raft of the Medusa, Madrid, 1987, p. 19.
[5] " is Structuralism ... the name that has been known to say, the conversion of the critical philosophy of phenomenology . (...) The inventor of the structural method is probably "The teacher of philosophy" Moliere staged in "The Bourgeois Gentleman" (Act II, Scene V). Mr. Jourdin want to write a letter to the Marquise ... He asks a rhetorical lesson the teacher ... "I only said these words of the paper, but willing according to fashion, arranged properly. Please tell me more or less, to get an idea, the various ways you can make. (...) There are two stages solving this problem: 1. identify the elements, and proceed to do the breakdown of the given set ... in elemental segments. 2. discover the different ways of composing these elements, so we get different messages and each other. " Descombes, V., "So and so", Ed Chair, Colección Teorema, Madrid, 1998, pp. 112-114.
[6] In positivist science concepts are meaningful only verifiable. Since the Vienna Circle and logical positivism positivist tradition collect objective thinking and the ability of science to discover the truth and the use of mathematical logic and to set standards and requirements of inquiry.
[7] Everything is in the language is in our world, it provides a linguistic register before which we can establish certain controls. Now, do not refer discourses circulating Cartesian truth, but with arguments supported cultural truths in terms of plausibility
[8] Foucault, M., "The Order of Things", Ed,, p. 206.
[9] are traditional categories of texts, such as: descriptive, argumentative, dialogue and narrative. And then there are texts: groundless, of opposition, and prescriptive.
[10] Secondly Call Spread (writing as thinking, track the difference). However, in its original context comes from the Destruktion * and ** Abbau spoken of Heidegger in Being and Time about the history of ontotheology. Both concepts allow an application to the structure or the traditional structure of the concepts of ontology "white."
* The Destruktion could appoint a negative operation here that the description highlights a simple data reception. Deconstruction is the form that highlights the phenomenological naivety, and therefore, this word is understood in a negative direction (down), but very positive (narrow) ...
** De-sedimentation of the layers of meaning in the genetic history of intentional production.
[11] Descombes, V., "So and so", Ed Chair, Colección Teorema, Madrid, 1998, pp. 110-179.
[12] Descombes, V., Ibid. pp. 183-184.
[13] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 183.
[14] Ontology present in Vattimo's words, aesthetics of existence in Foucault.
[15] Gadamer, H., "The hermeneutic turn", Ed Chair, Madrid, p. 97.
[16] For this reason, one might inquire sila phenomenology should pass through or radicalize "?.
[17] philological In the sense?
[18] significance of the difference may divide the present, and makes no absences. But it also makes this place really never have.
[19] Baudrillard, J., "De la seduction", Ed Chair, Madrid, p.67.
[20] Neologism created by Derrida from the verb differ: Differen, retarder, or carriers, verbs that one way or another further accentuate the notion of original delay. Differ is 'not identical' This differs from itself. It also means' leave for more forward ', this is a present deferred. This difference is what produces the story. If history is because from the beginning this is to lag itself.
[21] In the sense of 'catalog', 'file', or 'album', which in any way is a function of their shirts, sheets or windows that always lead somewhere.
[22] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 309.
[23] Derrida, J., "The philosophical language and institutions ", Ed, 1995, p. 32.
[24] "... the school and the books have not obscured or overshadowed ...", Derrida, J., Ibid, p. 62.
[25] Peñalver, P., in the introduction to the work of Derrida, J., "The deconstruction at the borders of philosophy-The withdrawal of metaphor", Polity Press / ICE - UAB Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1989, p.17.
[26] Repetition of the word repeat, repeat, reproduce, reflect. Test.
[27] "Metaphysics is then to exclude non-presence determining the supplement as simple exteriority, as mere addition, or as pure absence." Derrida, J., Ibid, p.211.
[28] Baudrillard, J., Ibid, p. 55.
[29] Baudrillard, J., Ibid, p. 69.
[30] Derrida., J., "Of Grammatology", Ed Twenty First Century, Madrid, 1998, p. 203.
[31] Derrida, J., "Of Grammatology" p. 308.
[32] Peñalver, P., Ibid, p.17.
[33] Derrida, J., Ibid, p. 398.
[34] Is there a place outside of metaphysics that allows us to withstand the pressure of Logos? Or are we doomed to provide all that is in a structural sense, and give, sickly at all-as-you-we-show, meaning.
[35] Left unfinished investigate the relationship of Derrida in Hegel ...
[36] The form gives the impression of separation.
[37] Intelligere in Latin means "to read in depth the meaning of things", he read deeply to be understood as a system of signs or language back to humanity.
[38] Benjamin and Bataille are precedents to this thought, since both were questioned, the first in what is absent and the second in exaltation about 'what remains' in the text.
[39] Following the so-called "foreign thoughts" (returns to myth, foreign traditions, and Eastern wisdom) Foucault developed a constitutive element of being, which he calls 'souci de toi' under a 'techne tou biou', ie existential practice allows the subject to overcome himself, or self-improvement: Self-healing, understood ascetic techniques, yoga and demases ... These are all technologies I = (Home Care).
