D ince we assume as the social sciences course that man is a gregarious and of culture. Thus, culture is opposed to the term nature. Meaning by this that men and women live in nature but do not have the repertoire to survive independently, so on the basis of knowing and doing are allowed to adapt by technical criteria, which enable practical human relations through intersubjective understanding processes and otherness.
Note, the interest component of our knowledge. Knowledge becomes practical, as the basic guidelines of our rationality are technical and moral. The child born to a reality that will be sui generis. He / she goes from one medium tote, a whole in which no subject or object, as in the womb living in an experience that Montevechio described as "Ocean" as there would be only pleasure. However, at birth, is born in an environment where everything is lack, and all is need, in this way, the subject is individual, the individual must become to meet their needs, which are in principle unlimited. Henceforth, he must learn to delay pleasure, or strengthen tolerance to frustration. Later, resilience.
Note, the interest component of our knowledge. Knowledge becomes practical, as the basic guidelines of our rationality are technical and moral. The child born to a reality that will be sui generis. He / she goes from one medium tote, a whole in which no subject or object, as in the womb living in an experience that Montevechio described as "Ocean" as there would be only pleasure. However, at birth, is born in an environment where everything is lack, and all is need, in this way, the subject is individual, the individual must become to meet their needs, which are in principle unlimited. Henceforth, he must learn to delay pleasure, or strengthen tolerance to frustration. Later, resilience.
+ + +
As a result: Everything is back cultural product, as it has a theory of knowledge. If being premodern was structured ontological mode, with the emergence of the theory of knowledge begins a period (epistemological) driven by a new subject by providing critical capability, autonomy and rationality. In the twentieth century is when starting a critique of critical discourse or society. To critics of modernity weaknesses emancipatory project are obvious, but the Reason value as it involves both mental processes and awareness of the given. According to Foucault, Nietzsche, Marx and Freud founded a new type of interpretation that puts us in the presence of interpretive techniques.
The new interpretation questions the interpreter . In this way, they make a scientific and critical analysis of modern rationality, noting that the promise of enlightened discourse are not being met, revealing the existence of ideological discourse. Meaning thereby that the ideology concealed the contradictions of the model.
The hypothesis states that the type of knowledge determines the type of society, so that life forms would be associated with certain types of knowledge, specifying a lifestyle characterized dominant values.
In this context, power is the ability to perform securities that allow us to develop personally. We refer to capabilities (skills), cognitive, emotional and aesthetic. The power to build our own existence.
The new interpretation questions the interpreter . In this way, they make a scientific and critical analysis of modern rationality, noting that the promise of enlightened discourse are not being met, revealing the existence of ideological discourse. Meaning thereby that the ideology concealed the contradictions of the model.
The hypothesis states that the type of knowledge determines the type of society, so that life forms would be associated with certain types of knowledge, specifying a lifestyle characterized dominant values.
In this context, power is the ability to perform securities that allow us to develop personally. We refer to capabilities (skills), cognitive, emotional and aesthetic. The power to build our own existence.
++++++++ + + +
+ + + + * * *
+++++
+++++
S and assumes that the classical culture within all people have a firm consistency and the same admiration for the rules, models, images, among others, establishing common codes to associate the meaning of the words, events, and above all ensure that this culture forward as a function of content of communication [1] . Thus "the cultural field" [2] restructuring is transformed by successive revolutions rather than radical.
late-modern perspective is presented as an alternative as to reveal the code that every culture has. Making the assumption that the type of knowledge determines the type of society. Thus, ways of life are associated with certain types of knowledge, identifying lifestyle and characterizing key values.
++++++
+++++++++++ +++++++
Notes
+ +
[ 1] Also called "spirit of time" or "unitary vision of the world."
[2] Culture is not just a code or a common repertoire of responses, is a shared set of fundamental patterns, from which articulated a number of private schemes.
[ 1] Also called "spirit of time" or "unitary vision of the world."
[2] Culture is not just a code or a common repertoire of responses, is a shared set of fundamental patterns, from which articulated a number of private schemes.
0 comments:
Post a Comment